Kent wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:47 am
joeyv23 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:03 pm
This issue is close to home for all of us here, but especially for our friends that have been personally affected by the operation, and it is not an easy pill to swallow. Given the very nature of what brings us all together as uncommitted investigators it is important that we all endeavor to reevaluate everything we hold to be true in the face of new information. Antiquatis is currently down as this is being sorted out. It is my belief that we will make it through this and come out of the other end with a fresh new outlook on things that will allow for a very real and true experience of what magic is for each of us.
Thank you for the update Joey. These are fascinating revelations, and I have nothing but sympathy for those affected by the program.
You say that AQ is down as this is being sorted out...I'm a little unclear as to what exactly you mean by that. What is being sorted out? Can you go into any more detail? Also, you say that we should reevaluate everything we hold to be true. Does this include the work/discussion that has been held regarding RS2 and the nature of cosmos? I found this model particularly helpful, especially as it was being used to explain the evolution of consciousness.
Well, if I understand Daniel's latest update correctly I wouldn't say that it was dealing with magic (although I would use the spelling 'magick' as it pertains to what we're talking about here) which is causing the trouble. Rather, I would guess that it's what he was attempting to do which might have drawn someone's ire. He posted an early excerpt of his most recent paper to fb, and it seemed to me that his intent is to help people discover how to work magick on their own by illustrating its history, where it comes from, and what it is. He was leading people to water, and it's no surprise that someone or some group of people (ie. "TPB", the macrobe, or some other unknown entity) would want to derail attempts at empowering people if they are benefiting from our ignorance.
I've spent the last year and a half working with daniel on honing my extrasensory/magical abilities. Last year I gained access to the Archive of the Ancients. Last month, in January, I obtained access to the Other realm. Two weeks later, I became part of a council of (mostly) "otherworldly" existences. As a result, it falls to me to set some things straight. The issue now is unspinning certain things that have been the topic of conversation with regards to the development of magic -- things that put me at odds with the person who helped the understanding more than anyone else. I would like very much to work through some of the discrepancies with this person, but I don't know how possible that is now. The fount that folks are being led to is under threat of being poisoned and it's to that end that I've taken my stance. Not just for me, but for generations to come to have the opportunity to engage in reality in a different way than our species has, collectively, for centuries and millennia until now. The collective still has a ways to go and plenty of room to grow, but it IS evolving. It may not look this way to any casual observer, but take note that what we see in our everyday lives are the outermost layers of the experience that we are undergoing. Just because there aren't an equal amount of people working to develop themselves and evolve, and the few that are aren't in the mainstream eye doesn't mean that it isn't occurring. In many respects we are simultaneously evolving and devolving. The nature of this situation will be discussed below.
The macroscopic influence that engenders Blue Beam type programming is the issue at hand. I've spent my life subconsciously becoming a person who could make prey out of the truest apex predator in our reality, this macroscopic thing that feeds on the energies that humanity so readily exudes. It's existence here is not a unique phenomena. There are plenty of inhabited planets who are at developmental stages similar to ours that have/will/are experienced/experience/experiencing this type of situation. The previous statement is made from direct personal experience and should not be accepted without exploring those aspects of our experience yourselves. To that end I recommend the information set forth in the daniel papers leading to the personal exploration of oneself via psychocartography. Never take anything anyone says at 100% acceptance. This is something I've learned in my time since beginning to consciously explore evolution towards
Homo Sapiens Ethicus. Take what I'm sharing and explore for yourself the validity of it. Don't be satisfied with my sharing this. Become an active participant.
It is part of our development forward that we rid ourselves of this parasitic, macroscopic existence. At first I could not find a way around this other than to go with what has been laid down for us, that the population must be decreased and waiting/hoping for some moment of release whereby some major momentous event (ELE) would take the population down. This is a viable method, granted. There is, however, another way. This method is likely something that won't find approval of by most who might find themselves here, but it's the route that I'm taking. I've been given the responsibility of finding a different route, and to that end I've begun biting back at the macrobe.
You see, focus on rapport is a good direction for development, so long as it does not become a limitation. We live in a reality dominated by needless rivalry. This is quite obvious and can be taken as a given. This happens to some degree or another to all species at one stage or another. Ours has experienced rivalry to a strong degree, given our longstandng heritage of the same as exemplified in the creation of this species as slaves. I will take pause here and explain that I look at our species' creation not just from the bottom up perspective of being genetic slaves, but also the top down perspective of an evolution of consciousness whereby interacting with the gods and their creating us here was a balancing act for the strong influence of the Elder race on a newly developing planet.
Going back to the issue of rapport as the better alternative to rivalry, I see this, too, a bit differently. Rapport and rivalry are two sides to the same coin. We can see
both occur in the natural world. Therefore aversion to rivalry, while important to a degree for development away from strong inclinations towards it, does nothing more than drive that aspect of the system into repression in the Shadow. Therein I am engaged in a type of rivalry and attempting to couple it with rapport (not an easy task) and help a friend be free of an influence that has taken the most fragile thread in the tapestry of our existence and put it at great risk. This thread, if allowed to be pulled, will see the direction of movement on this planet approach and accelerate towards inverse harmony/ chaos/ atrophy. To put it simply, the planet and everything on it will eventually dry up and become a barren, empty husk. I am working with others to keep that from happening. And so when the tendrils of the macroscopic influences present themselves, I chop them up and eat them and I encourage others of a similar inclination to do the same. Bite back. Don't be fooled into sitting pretty waiting for an opportunity for things to all of a sudden work themselves out. That's not going to happen and we can't rapport our way into utopia. That's not how nature works. Question everything. And everyone. Think for yourselves. Feel for yourselves. Think with others and feel with others, but always double back and re-evaluate. Energy does not move in a stagnant pool and when we don't question each other, this is exactly what happens. No amount of "honor" exempts any of us from this type of scrutiny and evaluation.
To answer the question posed, I think the work of RS2 stands for itself. It is in the very nature of the work that we each develop within ourselves the string of natural consequences that lead to those ideas and concepts. The things which I have placed under scrutiny are the direction that this knowledge is being taken and applied - things that would likely end up in the next paper such as the existence of a certain entity that would have us believe it to be the Animus of the planet - when I have seen directly that this is a deception - and a concomitant push towards the ideas of 'technomage' as a result of interaction and development of terms with said entity. It is to that end that I've started this discussion. I'll do my very best to answer any and all questions. I do respect the need for secrecy for some things, especially where magical practice is concerned, but in this endeavor I am going to be as candid and transparent about things as I possibly can.