MrGreen wrote:I've come to realize people are far too hard on Wilcock, including myself at one point.
He's certainly not perfect, and I'd prefer he'd more or less own up to his certain predictions and time-lines that never comes to pass instead of just continuing on with more claims from these "insider" sources of his, but in reality he means well. He's actually quite dedicated in his research, and has apt skill in being able to connect the dots and bring different areas into one coherent message. I believe his down-fall is that he's too invested in a positive outcome, and thus sort of drops his guard and discerning ability and attaches himself to false outcomes and questionable information because of it. He's actually under quite a bit of pressure and probably receives the most extremely harsh criticism that I believe remains unwarranted.
He's really just trying to find his way like the rest of us, and has done more good than harm if you ask me.
I was at my local library and caught "The Synchronicity Key" while I was doing some work at the computers. I certainly hadn't planned on purchasing it but used this opportunity to read it free-of-charge and found it useful to an extent, if not interesting.
I don't agree with the people who claim he's purposefully misleading people with disinformation, and he's more capable than given credit for.
I very much agree with this! In today's day and age, absolute truth is hard to determine with so much information and disinformation, and even the best of us, can go down the wrong path unintentionally. Which funny enough, is the point and purpose of disinformation. I’m constantly hearing information from so called “inside sources” that never really bear any fruit other than what can be perceived as rumors. You can look at the internet and see that disinformation is alive and well by counting how many fractured groups there are all telling a slightly different story. At the end of the day, I could very well question the validity of these forums as much as I can question the validity of DW. Not that I do, I enjoy deeply the conversations that take place here and even more so, the papers that Danielle puts together.
That being said, there are things that are verifiable and after years of trying to find the truth, I've come to the realization I can only stick with what I know is true. And everything else that seems to be nothing but distortion interlaced with truth, I have to filter out. I haven’t given up necessarily on inside sources, but they don’t hold as much credence as verifiable fact. Tangible things that I know are true to me. Not rumors of so called incoming arrests, which makes anyone on the precipice of real change become complacent. Why? because someone else is going to lift those heavy weights, why do I need to…
So I don’t discount DW, because a lot of what he discusses is good information that shouldn't be thrown to the side. Yes, I think he tends to lean too much on inside sources and in the end becomes a victim like most of us. But, if you filter out the distortion DW has really done a phenomenal job of putting together information and trying to connect the dots. Phantom DNA, pyramid experiments, mapping the genome, 7% increase in human evolution, UFO timelines and events, etc. etc. This is good information. Incoming arrests, white dragon society is here to save us, etc. etc. to me, distortion. And I just hate labeling someone as being bad with bad intentions, because they've gotten sucked into the world of disinformation.
I like to discount the information, not the individual. Though, this isn't always the case. There are some people that I just refuse to listen to, because everything out there mouth is a lie.
BTW, good to be back. It's been a long time since I've posted.
) folks. 