Chemtrail paper from Richard Malinowski

[soldierhugsmember]

Chemical and Biological Warfare Testing

The first proposed explanation for the ChemTrail phenomena concerns chemical and biological warfare testing using real, reduced-potency biochemical agents or biochemical simulants. At first thought, many readers will probably find the idea that the United States government would use its citizens as guinea pigs for some hideous set of biological experiments, to be repulsive and absurd. Well, in reality, tests such as these were in fact conducted repeatedly by our military, the national laboratories, and various government contractors during the years following World War II. These experiments were designed to gauge the effectiveness of a wide range of deadly biological and chemical warfare agents and their associated delivery systems. In all likelihood, these same policies and programs remain in effect and viable to this very day. When you stop to consider the nature of the agents used in these experiments, it is no wonder why so many isolated pockets of disproportionate and extreme illnesses, diseases, and birth defects have appeared all over this nation!

In the past, biological, chemical, and nuclear agents have been tested on US populations from New York to San Francisco—from coast to coast. To date, there have been at least two separate US Senate investigations into the ramifications of Open Air biochemical warfare testing involving US citizens in selected cities across America. These government hearings were held in 1977 and 1994.

In the 1950s, 240 cities in the U.S. were subjected to biochemical testing. One of the primary biological agents used during this time was Aspergillus Fumigatus, a fungus causing the disease aspergillosis, which can be fatal. A favorite chemical agent of the 1950s, was Zinc Aluminum Sulfide. In the 1960s, the chemical Zinc Cadmium Sulfide was experimented with using our people as nonconsensual lab rats. During the 1970s, the bacterium Serratia Marcescens, a bacteria that can produce serious infections leading to death in some cases, was used. In the 1980s, the chemical agent Dimethyl Methylphosphonate (DPP) was directed against the unsuspecting citizens of our country, by our government. DPP is a carcinogen having extreme toxicity. Throughout the decade of the 1990s, the United States government and its military armed forces, have callously targeted our cities and communities with a number of sophisticated biochemical agents. The chemical, Ethylene Oxide and the bacterium Bacillus Subtilis were just two of these that were tested at the expense of our personal health and safety—our lives.

Under laboratory examination, the ChemTrail material currently falling from our skies is beginning to reveal a wide range of advanced laboratory-created biochemical components. These are presently being dispersed from U.S. military KC-135 tankers, in a cocktail of JP8+100 jet fuel, laced with Ethylene Dibromide (EDB), a very dangerous, banned, chemical pesticide. We will take a closer look at this treacherous ChemTrail cocktail a little later in this article. For the present, suffice it to say that for more than 20 years, we as a nation have been subjected to some of the most abominable and reprehensible assaults imaginable, directed against us by our very own US government and military armed forces. These people have demonstrated by their actions that they have absolutely no respect or regard for lab rats—human or otherwise.

In order to be able to carry out these experiments with legal impunity, our leaders wrote certain provisions into the US Code, specifically, Title 50, Chapter 32. This entire chapter of the code is designed to permit our government to carry out nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) testing on US citizens, as they deem necessary, for the sake of our national security and defense. Chapter 32, in effect, guarantees that the US government or its officials may not be held liable for any resulting damages, either individual or corporate, suffered by the people of this country as a consequence of these tests.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

The following quote is a verbatim excerpt from the US Code, Chapter 32, Sections 1520 and 1515. If you have any doubts as to the desire or willingness of our leaders to use us, its citizens, for unconscionable NBC experimentation, without the slightest regard for our personal health, safety, or well being, then please read these two quotations, and acquaint yourself with the relevant legal facts.

CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM US Code on Human Subjects Testing as REVISED in Nov 1997 U.S. CODE TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520(a).

Sec. 1520a. Restriction on the use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents

(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
(d) Prior notice to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees.
(e) Biological agent defined
In this section, the term biological agent means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing:
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

Section 1520(a), paragraph (e), describes the nature of biological and chemical testing and defines a biological agent, as understood by our government. Notice that although paragraph (a) initially states that such testing may not be carried out on the civilian population, of the United States, by the Department of Defense or any of its contractors; paragraph (b) goes on to enumerate all of the exemptions to this prohibition. This is the first loop-hole. When we look at the range and scope of these exemptions, we find that they cover just about everything imaginable; and therefore, effectively negate the protections provided by paragraph (a). Paragraphs (c) requires that the informed consent of every person involved in the test be obtained by the Secretary of Defense. Paragraph (d) goes on to state that the Congress of the United States must be notified in advance of the intention of the Department of Defense to conduct biological or chemical experimentation on US citizens.

Taken in total, it would appear that although the Department of Defense, or its contractors, may in fact use us as guinea pigs or lab rats for virtually any biological or chemical experimentation that they might wish to engage in, we at least retain the pseudo-protection of having to provide our explicit permission, in order for them to do so. In addition, It would appear that we also retain the benefit of a congressional review along with a thirty-day moratorium. In effect then, it would appear that according to this law, it should not be possible for our government to carry out such a barbaric act against the people of the United States without their full knowledge and explicit consent, right? Wrong!
To see where the second loop-hole enters the picture, the reader will have to read Section 1515 of Chapter 32, provided below:

U.S. CODE TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1515

Sec. 1515. Suspension; Presidential authorization
After November 19, 1969, the operation of this chapter, or any portion thereof, may be suspended by the President during the period of any war declared by Congress and during the period of any national emergency declared by Congress or by the President.

A brief review of Section 1515 tells us all that we need to know. According to Section 1515, all of the protections afforded by Section 1520(a) are rendered mute by an act of the President of the United States—by a simple suspension of any of the protective statutes contained anywhere in the whole of Chapter 32, including Section 1520(a). There is a precondition to this action however. Section 1515 states that in order for the President to evoke a suspension of these legal protections, the country, the United States of America, must be in a state of National Emergency, declared by either the President or the Congress. Are we in a state of National Emergency? Can the President, William Jefferson Clinton, act to suspend our protections under Section 1520(a)? The answer to both of these questions is a definite—yes.


continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

According to a recent article by Sara Foster, entitled "The Imperial Presidency," and published by WorldNetDaily, 1.26.1999, we are now under no less than twelve separate and concurrent states of National Emergency! A quotation from Ms. Foster's article is provided below, which clearly enumerates all of these current National Emergencies. These declarations and declaration-renewals are a matter of public record and may be verified through any number of government Internet sites.

"Despite Congress' effort, a dozen or so national emergencies have been declared and renewed annually, and are right now in effect. These are premised upon problems with Iran (every year since 1979), Libya (since 1986), Iraq (since 1990), Yugoslavia (since 1992), proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (since 1993), UNITA (Angolan anti-Communists, since 1993), Middle East terrorism (since 1995), Colombian drug dealers (since 1995), Cuba (since 1996), Burma (since 1997), and Sudan (since 1997). Even the expiration of a statute, the Export Administration Act of 1979, caused President Clinton to declare and renew a state of national emergency (since 1994)."

-From: Sara Foster, The Imperial Presidency, WorldNetDaily, 1.26.1999.

All of these factors, taken together, lead us inescapably to the following conclusions: Although laws do in fact exist, that protect all of the citizens of the United States from biological and chemical experimentation, in the manner of nonconsensual lab-rats, the President of the United States may, at his discretion, declare a state of National Emergency, and then privately declare a suspension of all of these legal protections. This suspension need not be related to any of the current National Emergencies, in any way whatsoever. Furthermore, the President does not even need to inform us of the fact that these protections, which are in reality a matter of life and death, have actually been suspended—at his prerogative, he just has to do it, and they are!

In reality then, we, as a people, have been continuously subjected to what may be considered, for all practical purposes, a sequence of biochemical attacks, by the Secretary of Defense, the Department of Defense, the military armed forces, and its contractors, all with the blessing and support of the president of the United States. Furthermore, by virtue of sections 1520 and 1515 of the US Code, we possess neither legal protection nor defensive recourse against this barbarous act. It would appear then, that we are totally at their mercy—the unwilling victims of this criminal assault. Whenever and wherever they desire, these forces are apparently free to conduct any biological or chemical experimentation of their choosing, using us as non-consenting laboratory test subjects. We in turn, have no alternative but to allow them to do exactly as they please, while we suffer, individually and corporately, the many consequences and atrocities of their unconscionable acts. These are the facts, fellow Americans! So why does the rhetoric of our leaders so vehemently condemn other nations for what they refer to as human rights violations (HRV), when they themselves are guilty of such abominations against the men, women, and children of their very own country? Can you think of any HRV more reprehensible than this?

Only the president of the United States may stop this immoral activity by refusing to act to suspend our legal protection from such assaults. The National Emergency status only allows him to suspend our rights, it does not mandate that he do so. He can protect the people of America if he so chooses—by a simple refusal to evoke this suspension. However, judging by the apparent malignant nature of the ChemTrail campaign, we would probably be safe in assuming that he has in fact not acted in our behalf—ignoring completely and callously, the health, safety, and well being of all those whom he has taken a solemn oath to protect. What do you think?

Now that we know that chemical and biological warfare testing using biological agents, as defined in Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520(a), and paragraph(e) above, are permitted under law, and may be carried out without our consent or congressional approval, we need to look into the possibility that this might be the focus and objective of the current ChemTrail campaign.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

To resolve the issue of chemical or biological testing, we first need to understand just what constitutes a biochemical test or experiment. We need to look at the methodology employed in every type of scientific experimentation, and determine if these fundamental principles are evidenced by the current ChemTrail campaign. If we find that the characteristics of the ChemTrail phenomena do not meet the minimal requirements for good, scientific, experiment design, then we can probably conclude that chemical and biological testing, or experimentation, is not at the root of this aerial operation. On the other hand, if we do find evidence of good, scientific methodology present in these activities, then the case for biological and chemical testing is that much stronger.

All experimentation is based upon the principles found in what is known as the scientific method. Under this methodology, preliminary research and general experiments are performed which generate data. Analysis of this data in turn naturally leads to a set of hypotheses or questions. Experiments are then designed in order to determine whether each of these hypotheses are true or false. The design of the experiment also entails the design of a detailed and effective data collection program or mechanism which will be used to gather the resulting data output of the experiment. Once this is in place, the experiment is executed. During the execution of the experiment, data is collected. Once collected, the data is then subjected to detailed analysis and correlation. Finally, based on this analysis, the target hypotheses are either proven to be true or deemed false. Generally, this new information is then used as the basis for further experimentation, and the cycle repeats.

Any research, experimentation, or testing that does not follow this basic methodology, will not produce useful or meaningful results. Even the simplest tests must adhere to these fundamental principles of scientific inquiry—chemical and biological warfare testing included.

One of the tenets of good experiment design is the minimization or neutralization of extraneous variables. If there are too many interdependent and uncontrolled variables involved in an experiment then the data will have little if any significance. This principle requires that good experiments be designed and executed in such a way as to deliberately minimize and isolate the number of significant variables entering the test. Experiments therefore, need to be narrowly focused, carefully executed, and rigidly monitored in order to yield meaningful results. Without this discipline, the resulting data becomes unintelligible and therefore useless.

These are the basic scientific facts surrounding experimentation design and execution. Any analysis of the ChemTrail campaign as a test or experiment therefore, needs to be performed in terms of these underlying scientific principles. There are no effective shortcuts in science and engineering, and we should not expect that we would find this instance to be any different.

It is probably safe to assume, that throughout the years, an extensive amount of research has been performed in the area of chemical and biological warfare. Various hypotheses have undoubtedly been formulated, experiments have most certainly been designed and executed, and all sorts of data from these experiments has surely been collected and been subjected to detailed and time-consuming analysis. From these new understandings and discoveries, derived from both proven and disproven hypotheses, new experiments have undoubtedly been designed. The first question is, are these programs and experiments currently active and still being executed, and are we, the unsuspecting population, presently being used as the current species-of-choice, the proverbial lab rat? The second question is, are the ChemTrails evidence of this ongoing biochemical experimentation?

There are two general areas, or questions, on which these experiments might reasonably focus—biochemical agent effectiveness, and agent delivery system efficiency. However, designing experiments to test these two factors is not quite as simple as it might appear, due to their interdependence. Any monitoring system that is designed to measure the effectiveness of a given agent, will be affected by the efficiency of the delivery system, and any system designed to measure the efficiency of the delivery system would be affected by the effectiveness of the agent. Any such experiments and their monitoring systems, therefore, need to be very carefully designed and executed so as to minimize this interaction among the variables involved. This, in fact, is no simple matter.

Regardless of whether we are considering agent effectiveness or delivery system efficiency as the focus of these possible tests, an extensive and test-specific monitoring system infrastructure must be designed and implemented as an integral part of the experiment. This system must be able to reliably measure the results of the experiment and provide unambiguous data for future correlation and analysis. Obviously, the greater the scale and scope of the experiment, the more extensive and elaborate the monitoring system needs to be. All of the variables associated with these experiments and their interrelationships must be accounted for.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

If we now look once more at the scope of the ChemTrail campaign, it quickly becomes apparent that the data-collection and monitoring systems needed to support an experiment of this magnitude and scale would be enormous. To implement such an experiment, would involve thousands of dedicated individuals and a great deal of sophisticated equipment. Extensive preparation and planning would also be required, in order to be able to monitor and assess the full effects of the experiment on each of the citizen participants—such preparations could hardly be kept a secret for very long, and would soon become common knowledge for the entire population.

If chemical and biological testing were the objective of the ChemTrail campaign, then we would expect to see a much more restricted scale and scope selected for this project, instead of extending the domain to the entire continental United States of America! Furthermore, we would not expect to see these experiments carried out simultaneously over all parts of the country, under a myriad of different weather conditions, and geographic topographies. There would simply be too many variables to contend with, requiring monitoring resource facilities that would be unbelievably complex and prohibitively extensive. Such a widespread operation would quickly become so obvious to every one of the unsuspecting lab rats involved in the experiment that this could hardly be considered a very reasonable implementation of a secret, covert operation.

The chemical and biological testing of biochemical warfare agents and their delivery systems is therefore not a very reasonable or acceptable explanation for this phenomena. On the surface, we might certainly be tempted to pursue this line of investigation further; however, when serious thought is given to the requirements for such an operation, from a scientific perspective, it soon becomes clear that meaningful scientific experimentation on such an enormous scale is not very useful. Therefore, without evidence of an elaborate, nation-wide monitoring network, in place and operational, to collect and sort out the myriad of test data generated by this kind of experiment, we have no choice but to conclude that this hypothesis is virtually untenable.

It is worth noting that in the past, government testing of biological and chemical warfare agents has always focused on a single biochemical agent, or a single delivery system at a time as the basis for each experiment. The ChemTrail cocktail, that we will examine a little later, turns out to be anything but a single biochemical agent. In fact, it has all the characteristics of a purposefully designed laboratory creation having a predetermined specification for accomplishing a predetermined objective—well beyond its experimental phase of development.

It is also worth noting that all of these earlier tests were performed over highly restricted geographic domains, being limited to certain areas of a city or some other clearly defined region, where normal controls could be exercised—not the entire continental United States. In all of these early experiments, the operational characteristics being demonstrated were in complete agreement with what we would expect to see if we were dealing with a true test or laboratory experiment. They were totally in line with the methodology of normal scientific inquiry and experimentation technique. In the case of the ChemTrail phenomena however, all of these highly disciplined controls are conspicuously missing—in their entirety.

Although there is no doubt that nuclear, chemical, and biological testing have been carried out across our country in the past, using American citizens as the customary laboratory guinea pigs of choice, it is very difficult to justify an interpretation of the facts surrounding the current ChemTrail campaign that would characterize this as a present day example of such a program.

On the other hand, the ChemTrail campaign does possesses all of the earmarks and characteristics of a well planned and orchestrated military mission, having both a clearly defined time-frame and apparent ultimate objective. Such a mission-based operation does not require extensive monitoring systems, because the outcome of the exercise is predetermined and already known and expected to some degree. Its scale or scope could easily encompass the entire United States with very little difficulty or complications. All that is necessary to determine the relative success or failure of such an operation is some rudimentary form of broad-based sampling of the observable effects. Monitoring hospital statistics in carefully selected areas of the country for example, is all that would be required to effectively gauge or measure the success of such a mission. Remember, this type of an operation is not designed to be an experiment or a test, the objective is not to prove an hypothesis or to discover some new information, it is simply a mission, a task, an operational objective, designed to accomplish some goal—it is not a learning experience.

Our tentative assessment therefore, of the probability that the ChemTrail campaign constitutes some form of chemical and biological experimentation, focusing on either the warfare agent itself or the dynamics of its delivery system, must be relatively low. Without evidence of a complex and extensive test monitoring apparatus and infrastructure, and considering the ubiquitous extent of its geographic domain, it is simply not possible to justify the conclusion that this type of activity lies at the root of the ChemTrail phenomena.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

Weather Modification Experimentation by the Military

If the complexities involved in conducting a nationwide program of chemical and biological warfare experimentation, preclude this as being a viable explanation for the ChemTrail phenomena, then the even more complex issues involved in any experimentation involving the modification of normal weather patterns, carried out simultaneously over the entire United States, is even more untenable as a viable interpretation of ChemTrail activity.

Weather phenomena are so complex and nonlinear, that even our most sophisticated supercomputers have not yet been able to generate a truly workable and predictive model. Any attempt to define the weather mathematically requires an extensive set of non-linear equations whose variables and their myriad interrelationships are, at present, beyond our complete understanding. Weather patterns follow more closely the laws and characteristics of fractal mathematics and chaos theory than they do the tenants of conventional linear equations. This extreme complexity makes understanding weather phenomena radically more difficult than even the complexities of biochemical warfare dynamics. Consequently, to attempt such experimentation on a continuous, national level, without the ability to do effective data collection at this same level, would only produce results that were of dubious scientific value, at best. Again, as in the case of biological and chemical warfare testing, it is the extreme scope of the operation that renders this hypothesis untenable.

While there is no doubt that the military and its various contractors are engaged in extensive experimentation involving HAARP technology, in their endeavor to bring the weather under man's control and domination, the ChemTrail activity is simply too extensive and weakly controlled and monitored to seriously be considered a critical or fundamental component of that research, comparatively speaking. All of the arguments for strict adherence to the principles of the scientific method in the design of any experiment, that we presented for the testing of biochemical warfare agents above, apply with equal significance to the present case for weather modification. If these arguments are valid in the first instance than they must be equally valid in this instance as well.

Weather modification experimentation, therefore, is not a very likely candidate for a valid explanation of the ChemTrail campaign being waged in our skies across the entire continental United States and Canada. If this phenomena were restricted to a handful of clearly delineated geographic locations, and supported by an extensive local data collection network and related equipment and personnel, then it might be possible to attribute the ChemTrail phenomena to some aspect of this research project. But as it stands, the scope of this phenomena is simply too vast to ascribe it to a program of such extreme complexity.

It should also be pointed out that if weather modification were in fact the hidden objective behind the ChemTrail activity, then we would more than likely see many more examples of extreme weather episodes than we have encountered to date. The northeast portion of the country, where the ChemTrail campaign has been both fierce and persistent, has not had a single clear instance of extreme weather that could be correlated with statistical significance to local ChemTrail activity. The extreme weather phenomena that we do see, is most likely due to the more fundamental changes taking place in our planet's climatic signature—not military experimentation.

It should also be noted that HAARP (High Altitude Auroral Research Project) is technically an ionospheric device, and ChemTrail activity is primarily limited to the comparatively much lower altitudes of the troposphere. The use of HAARP technology to alter the position of the jet stream, and thereby affect manifest weather patterns at ground levels, would seem to gain very little performance enhancement from dispensing biological agents at altitudes of from several thousand feet to perhaps 24,000 feet above sea level. Attempting to attribute the ChemTrail phenomena to some aspect of HAARP technology and weather modification would appear to require a considerable stretch of the imagination, to say the least.

HAARP, however is not the only military program aimed at gaining a measure of control over the weather in order to selectively enhance battlefield conditions to favor tactical mission success. The pentagon's "Aerial Obscuration" project, designed to obscure visibility, and reduce the vulnerability of low-flying military attack aircraft over hostile territory, is a very real military research program. These experiments attempt to make use of tanker-type aircraft, such as the KC-135, to lay-down artificial cloud formations in the atmosphere to make it difficult to track and target our aircraft by enemy anti-aircraft integrated defense systems.

It is however, very difficult to imagine how continuous and simultaneous, nationwide ChemTrail operations, in virtually all types of prevailing local weather conditions, and over every possible geographic terrain, could produce meaningful empirical data. To constitute effective research, the geographic domains associated with these experiments would have to be very narrowly delineated in order to control the number and interaction of the many variables involved in such testing. Nationwide, concurrent testing would generate so much data that there would be virtually no possibility of being able to gather and marshal all of this information, in order to render it suitable for analysis and statistical correlation. Experimentation of this sort would more likely be carried-out over military bases, and would probably be accompanied by many specialized monitoring and participating military aircraft—this kind of an operation could hardly occur without being witnessed by many ground observers, if carried-out over populated areas.

The lab analyses that have been performed, to date, on samples of the ChemTrail fallout indicate that there is a heavy biological component to this material. It is also difficult to imagine the potential contribution that placing biological material in our atmosphere could have in our military's quest to control the weather—chemicals, possibly; bacteria, fungus, and virus components, not very likely.

Therefore, although this is an interesting and powerful possibility, considering the weight of these arguments, and their associated practical considerations, we would have to conclude that weather modification experimentation is most likely not the focus of the mystery ChemTrails that have been plaguing our skies for the past several months. Consequently, we would probably do well to eliminate this as a reasonable candidate, and continue our search elsewhere for a more plausible and realistic explanation.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

The Strange Biology of the ChemTrails

In order to examine the last two possible explanations for the ChemTrail phenomena, we need to spend a little time looking at the biochemical composition of the ChemTrail solid-form fallout. It is the composition of this fallout, along with the vastness of the overall program scope, that lends credence to the probability that these next two explanations might take us closer to the truth than we might care to find ourselves.

However, before discussing the ChemTrail cocktail pathogens, it is first necessary to talk a little more about the dispersion techniques used to distribute this biochemical payload to our unsuspecting population. It is readily apparent from simple observation, that the biochemical distribution methods being used are neither cavalier nor haphazard, but instead reflect a precise, military-style mission execution, of a carefully designed tactical chemical dispersion scheme, based on some clearly defined objective.

As mentioned earlier, the aircraft used for this mission have been identified as primarily KC-135 military tankers, but there have been some reports that the newer KC-10A tankers are also being employed. The US military currently has around 600 KC-135s and around 59 KC-10A aircraft on active duty and in reserve status. This numerical proportion supports the observed empirical distribution. Currently there are around 80 of these aircraft involved in the Kosovo theater which still leaves more than enough for carpet-deployment in this country.

In both cases, the method of dispersion used to distribute the ChemTrail cocktail primarily involves the use of the rear-mounted refueling tail boom. This method generates the characteristic single-element ChemTrail, as discussed earlier. Some of these tankers however, have been equipped with wing-tip mounted refueling pods, which will lay-down a distinct two-element, parallel ChemTrail; but these are not nearly as prevalent as the solitary ChemTrail footprint.

The primary chemical matrix used to host the ChemTrail cocktail appears to be a general aviation jet fuel, specifically, JP4 or JP8+100. During high altitude dispersion, typically around 24,000 feet, this fuel atomizes rapidly leaving behind the intended payload, which rapidly disperses and descends to the earth's surface.

The use of aviation petroleum products as the carrier matrix for the cocktail, is itself very significant. Laboratory analysis of the payload components indicates the presence of a type of bacterium that have a particularly intense liking for petroleum-based hosts. These bacterium thrive in such an environment and actually feed on the host carrier itself. This behavior is most likely a design specification of the cocktail, rather than merely a convenient coincidence. Also, due to its higher specific-gravity, the JP4 or JP8+100 fuel tends to drag the ChemTrail cocktail downward toward the ground through the atmosphere, as it evaporates, rather than allowing it to randomly disperse, at the mercy of high-altitude winds. The rate of descent of the payload would necessarily be a very important mission parameter if specific area-targeting were intended. This same factor is also most likely responsible for the apparent 20 mph wind speed limit imposed on spraying operations—to date, spraying has not been reported on days where wind ground-speeds exceed 20 mph.

Careful consideration of the observable ChemTrail program, seems to indicate that there are at least two phases to this mission. The first phase appears to involve an EPA-banned chemical, ethylene dibromide, as the payload agent, without the additional use of any biologicals. A logical assumption is that this operation generally continues for some time over the entire intended drop-zone, before the introduction of the biologicals. It is also entirely possible that this initializing phase never fully terminates, but continues to act in the background as a sensitizing and preparatory agent for the bacterium release of phase-two.

According to the available literature, Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) is apparently a very dangerous pesticide, which was banned in 1983 by the EPA as a definite carcinogen and chemical toxin. Nevertheless, EDB has some very interesting properties with respect to ChemTrails, that make it an effective precursor to a subsequent biological dispersal.

In 1991, the government ordered that aviation fuel used by commercial air carriers and the military, be converted from JP4 to JP8+100 and that ethylene dibromide be added to this fuel. Why this was done is still a mystery; at least no plausible official explanation has ever been given. Apparently, not everyone however, is required to use this mixture; the military it seems is allowed to continue its use of JP4 in some of its aircraft. JP4 fuel burns very cleanly in modern jet engines, whereas JP8+100, with ethylene dibromide is an environmental nightmare, providing anything but a clean-burn.

Burning ethylene dibromide in jet engines has the added special benefit of significantly increasing its toxic effects, which are substantial in themselves, even under normal conditions. It seems that the higher the temperature at which EDB burns, the greater its toxicity becomes when inhaled. Dispersing it through high temperature jet engine exhaust therefore, is an ideal means of maximizing its penetrative effectiveness as a general human health debilitator.

When inhaled, ethylene dibromide produces some rather interesting and significant results, many of which, most readers will be all too personally and painfully familiar with. EDB generally attacks the respiratory tract and induces severe infections to the throat and sinuses, causes a swelling of the lymph glands in the lungs, produces coughing fits, shortness of breath, sinus headaches, and general respiratory failure. EDB is also known to damage the heart, liver and kidneys, as well. More pointedly though, ethylene dibromide has the additional effect of priming the tissues of the lungs through severe irritation, and making them more susceptible to infection by other, even more aggressive biological agents. This would appear to be the primary function and purpose of phase-one of the multi-phase ChemTrail mission.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

Phase-two, capitalizing on the effects of phase-one, involves the use of biological agents—bacterium, viruses, molds, and fungi. To date there have been a number of biological specimens collected from the fallout of these spraying operations across the United States and Canada. These samples have been discovered in the form of a brown goo found clinging to various surfaces, such as the exterior walls of buildings, the windshields of automobiles, and other outdoor structures. Characteristically, this material is nearly impossible to remove with mere soap and water, and has proven to be highly toxic to anyone coming in contact with it. If this substance is encountered, it should be approached with caution, and then only by trained biohazards personnel. Do not under any circumstances touch it, handle it, or attempt to transport it by yourself.

It is believed that this biohazardous fallout is an unintentional byproduct of the aerosol spraying process. If you have ever used a can of spray paint, then you will have noticed that as you hold down the nozzle for any appreciable length of time, some of the paint tends to accumulate around the nozzle orifice and eventually drips down the spray nozzle. This is believed to be the same modality being demonstrated by the brown goo fallout. As the aerial spraying operation proceeds, some of the components of the biological cocktail accumulate around the spray nozzle orifices, and eventually increase in mass to the point where gravity takes over and they break free from the aircraft and fall to earth as a gelatinous goo. In these samples therefore, we have a fortuitous find—a concentration of the actual phase-two biological dispersant.

To date, ethylene dibromide has not been confirmed as a major component of any of the biological samples examined by the biochemical laboratories. Although earlier lab tests of jet fuel samples showed definite government mandated contamination by EDB, these tests were limited to actual fuel samples from aircraft fuel tanks and refueling operations. No samples of EDB, to our knowledge, have yet been collected from the open-air environment. However, what we do know, is that as a result of the government mandated addition of EDB to JP8+100 jet fuel, and the subsequent use of that fuel in both civilian and military aircraft, that this dangerous chemical has been deliberately and purposefully sprayed over the general population of the United States from 1991 to the present.

We can conclude from this discussion therefore, that there are in fact two distinct, symbiotic operations in effect. The first of which, phase-one, was designed to prepare the general public for the second, phase-two, by increasing our overall susceptibility to airborne biological infection through a general, continuous exposure to a long-term dispersal of ethylene dibromide. The second phase, which may be running concurrently with the first-phase operation in some form of synergistic alliance, consists of the aerosol distribution and delivery of a laboratory-engineered, biochemical cocktail, designed to take advantage of the opportunistic environment created during phase-one of the mission.

continued ....

[soldierhugsmember]

If we now take a look at the identified constituent components of the ChemTrail cocktail that we have been talking about, it will be apparent that the manifest medical symptoms associated with this designer-bacterium brew are the same symptoms being reported across the United States and Canada, and recognized by the CDC as epidemic in some parts of the country.

The second phase of this mission seems to have begun either in the early fall of 1998 or around January of 1999, depending upon who you talk to and where they live. It is probably safe to assume that phase-two is relatively new, and that it either followed directly on the heels of phase-one, or is preceding in parallel with it—after the EDB has had sufficient time to perform its intended function. The persistent, coincident appearance of the mysterious and ubiquitous ChemTrails, with the onset of phase-two is more than likely no accident of fate or misfortune.

At the time of this writing, a number of the biohazardous fallout samples have been submitted to government licensed and registered analytical biochemical laboratories for analysis. This herculean effort is the work of Mr. William Thomas, along with his team of researchers. Mr Thomas, whom we mentioned earlier, was the original journalist who first recognized and named the ChemTrail phenomena. Through his tireless and dogged tenacity, we are all getting closer to the truth surrounding this ongoing event, and hopefully, if his energy and convictions hold out, we will soon begin to see some daylight at the end of this bio-storm. In any case, Mr. Thomas, and his team, are to be highly commended for their effort, and I am certain, when this is all finally over, that they will be widely remembered for the dedication and the personal sacrifice that they expended in our behalf.

Mr.Thomas has reported on the results of two such laboratory analyses on the Art Bell radio program and in a number of places on the Internet. The samples chosen for these tests were taken from two communities in the United States, separated by more than 1000 miles and almost a full year time interval. Mr. Thomas reported that the laboratories involved in these tests, quickly characterized the primary constituents of the ChemTrail cocktail as a certified, fast-growing, biohazardous material. In addition to this general finding, the detailed results of these analyses, as released by Mr. Thomas, include the following primary elements:

The first constituent listed was an exotic marker component, used to identify the specific biological cocktail. This was rather unusual in that it is derived from a coral reef in an ocean on the other side of the world.

The second biological component found in the cocktail was the bacterium, Pseudomonas Fluorescens, which is a petroleum-obsessed organism that is responsible for serious blood infections. Mr. Thomas goes on to further characterize this organism as a bacterium that his research has shown to be named in more than 160 Pentagon patents with reference to both biological warfare applications and aerosol inoculation experiments. It is also cited in DOD literature as an experimental biowarfare bacteria. In addition, Pseudomonas Fluorescens is known to attack the respiratory system and is associated with severe coughing fits, general weakness, and vertigo. It is also extremely resistant to most antibiotics.

There are in nature, a number of other related Pseudomonas bacterium species; all of which have a strong fondness for petroleum products. These are generally distinguished by their pigments and pathology. Pseudomonas Fluorescens' coloration is yellowish-green while Pseudomonas Aeruginosa displays a predominantly blue pigment. Both of these are components of the ChemTrail cocktail being served to the American and Canadian people.

Although Aeruginosa was not specifically mentioned as being present in either of these two specific samples, other similar analyses, based on additional ChemTrail cocktail samples collected from many different locations, did reveal the presence of this particular bacterium. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen with a remarkable ability to cause diseases that invade and attack the respiratory system. Once infected by this bacteria, the linings of the lung walls will produce a thick mucous which results in difficulty in breathing, coughing fits, and shortness of breath, following only minor physical exertion. After the infections have taken hold, Aeruginosa generates a wide range of toxic proteins which cause extensive tissue damage and severely compromise the defense mechanisms of the immune system. It is also associated with bronchitis, pneumonia, ear and eye infections, meningitis, muscle and joint pain, cystic fibrosis, and gastrointestinal distress. Aeruginosa is also very antibiotic-resistant.

The third biological component found in the samples was a fungus called streptomyces. This particular fungus can be considered very unusual if encountered anywhere outside of a research laboratory. It is used primarily in the production of a wide variety of antibiotics, such as Tetracycline and Streptomycin. The non-lab form of this fungus can cause severe infections in human beings.

The fourth component discovered in our nefarious cocktail was a special bacillus which contained what is known as a DNA restriction enzyme. Restriction enzymes are used to crack DNA from one organism and transfer it through a biochemical process to another organism, thereby creating a type of directed mutation. It is found only in genetic engineering laboratories and is used as a tool to create exotic viruses with specific characteristics and pathologies, among many other uses.

In addition to the work directed by Mr. Thomas, other medical personnel along with a number of microbiologists have been collecting and analyzing their own samples of the ChemTrail fallout. Dr. Joseph Puleo, from northern Idaho, also sent a sample of this goo to a laboratory for analysis. The laboratory immediately reported back to Dr. Puleo that the substance which he gave them for analysis was extremely toxic. Furthermore, due to the fact that so many technicians at the laboratory had become seriously ill after working with the sample only briefly, the lab decided to return the ChemTrail sample to Dr. Puleo, and refused to complete their analysis.

continued ....